The Indicee Blog

Accounting for I.T. in the Finance Department

by Geoff Devereux on March 10th, 2010

An Interview with Wendy Van Donkelaar; CFO at MAKE Technologies

Last week, we were talking with Cheni Yerushalmi, co-counder of Sunshine Suites, about Measuring What Matters.  I think the main takeaway, from an Indicee point of view, is that the company’s Financial Reports were deemed much less important to the running of the business than were Operational Measures.

Today, we’ll move away from some of the broad philosophical implications of the question, “How do you measure success?” that we tackled with Cheni and move into the practical side of what measurement tools are being employed in mid-sized businesses and what measures are considered important in a conversation with MAKE Technologies CFO, Wendy Van Donkelaar.

MAKE Technologies Inc. is a Vancouver based software solution provider that analyzes and modernizes all three aspects of legacy enterprise applications: business processes, source code and data. MAKE’s modernization platform, TLM, helps their global customer base to reduce the cost & risk required to maintain and modernize their mission critical systems.

Wendy Van Donkelaar is a Financial Executive and Chartered Accountant with over 20 years experience in the technology sector.

I was interested in getting her take on the role of I.T. Systems for keeping tabs on the health of the business through the use of reports and KPIs.  What I found was, 1) she is strapped for time just like every other Finance Manager I’ve met over the past 10 years, and 2) she employs a number of tools to get the answers she needs to effectively manage the company’s finances.

So, here’s the Q & A:

1. How do you analyze operational performance? We use SFA [Salesforce Automation], SA [Simply Accounting] and excel spreadsheets to analyze performance.
2. What are the critical operations KPIs? Net new license and services revenues, Sales Funnel growth, Professional services utilization and G/M [Gross Margin], # of partner deals, # of presales presentations per quarter.
3. Do you analyze results on a project-by-project basis? Yes using an excel spreadsheet we are currently evaluating project management systems.
4. How is the Finance function changing/evolving with the onset of new technologies? The function has changed from one of historic information gathering to one of predictive analysis.
5. How do you view the role of spreadsheets in your line of work? Used for summarizing weekly Dashboard metrics and Board reporting.
6. Has your view of spreadsheets changed over time? How so? In my past, spreadsheets where often used for gathering and collating data so that analysis could then be performed.  It now seems like that step has been taken care of by SFA, SA or ERP [Enterprise Resource Planning] tools and I focus on smaller sets of data for analysis.

What does it all mean, man?

I’d like to highlight a few things in Wendy’s responses that, in my view, have a profound impact on all of us.  Call them sweeping generalizations if you must, but I see these responses as indicative of the typical situation for those of us working in mid-sized companies doing the accounting.

First, we’re living in a multiple-systems world.  By and large, when we are producing reports we are doing so by gathering data from various systems and collating that data into a cohesive picture of the enterprise.  The systems tend to operate independently of each other.  And inevitably, excel becomes the default aggregator.  Is this your experience? Make a comment!  What systems are you running and how do the systems integrate?

Second, inside the business, operations reports trump financial reporting any day of the week!  Check out the answer to question #2.  Of seven measures given, only one is truly a GAAP number.  Compliance dictates spending a great deal of time on Financial Reports, but these don’t provide actionable data in the same way that things like capacity utilization, or net new business, or sales pipeline does.  Share some of your operational measures in the comments!  What’s the focus in your workplace?

Third, predictive analysis has become mainstream.  There was a time that this topic was reserved for B.I. technicians, I.T. analysts, and academics.  More and more it’s becoming a practical requirement from management.  So, how do you management your predictions?  What oracle are you consulting? How many tea leaves must be read?  How can we know the future?

Let’s get some comments going!

  • Share/Bookmark

Measuring What Matters: Interview with Cheni Yerushalmi

by Geoff Devereux on March 3rd, 2010

Using Interviews to distill meaning

Last time, we were talking about how to “Think Like a Reporter“.  My goal was to convey the importance of asking good questions in order to figure out how things actually get done and what the critical elements are in your business.

Today, I’d like to take it one step further and showcase an interview I was fortunate enough to secure with Cheni Yerushalmi, the managing partner and co-founder of Sunshine Suites in New York City.  In the interview, I’ve tried to apply the principles of good questions in order to create an environment that’s conducive to storytelling.  Then, getting out of the way and letting Cheni tell his story.

The other key point I would like to offer up as a takeaway from this experience for all of you is to stay alert for opportunities to expand your networks and your knowledge base.  This interview would not have happened had it not been for: 1) Cheni’s willingness and his courage to put himself out there, 2) the enterprising, public invitation from Gary Vaynerchuk, founder of Wine Library TV and author of Crush It, and 3) my recognition of the opportunity and taking action.  These are all voluntary actions.  How can you ever bottle up this mix of bravery, curiosity, inquisitiveness, openness, and indeed playfulness that’s required to create something out of nothing into a “formula” or a “job description”?  This stuff doesn’t show up on your desk with a neat little bow on it, conveniently labeled and packaged for consumption.  You have to create it and I think that’s a useful lesson.

Instead of existing in a constant state of “beware”, move into a state of “BE AWARE”.

Back to the point, we are talking with Cheni Yerushalmi from Sunshine Suites in NYC about business, entrepreneurship, recognizing opportunity, and the critical measures that determine success within the business.

I’ll summarize and paraphrase some stuff here to keep the wordcount net-friendly, but feel free to look for some of Cheni’s other recent appearances here, here, here, and here for more great content.

Sunshine Suites NYC with Cheni Yerushalmi

What is Sunshine Suites?

Sunshine Suites is an office community in New York City specifically designed for entrepreneurs to get out of the house and network with other entrepreneurs in a cool environment.  Sunshine has 2 locations and houses roughly 600 businesses and 1400 entrepreneurs at any one time.  Far from being just another co-working site, Sunshine is serious about creating community!  In addition to a place to work they offer mentorship, events, gym memberships, affordable healthcare, and even access to a timeshare in Vermont’s ski country!

The types of businesses incubating within Sunshine runs the gamut, “every company under the sun”, as Cheni and his partner Joe will sometimes say.

What motivated you and your partner, Joseph Raby, to start the Sunshine Suites?

Sunshine Suites was the result of the frustrations experienced, as an entrepreneur, with the lack of both affordable office space and community support available in the city.  It was the realization that “there must be a better way”.

Leveraging each other’s strengths, as all good founding partners do, Cheni and Joe took the initiative to create the tool that they wished they had when starting out.

So, what would you say to people unfamiliar with the NYC start-up scene?

Historically, the NYC start-up environment has been difficult but it’s improving.  During the heady days of the Dot-Com’s there was interest from investors and lots of money flying around, but not much of an infrastructure to support the companies.  Since the bust, it has been a slow process of building that infrastructure and creating an environment better suited for start-ups.

A couple great examples of groups supporting this infrastructure are the New York City Economic Development Corp and the Coalition of Office Space Providers.

The message coming out of New York right now is innovate and build partnerships because right now nothing is being taken for granted.

How do you measure success at Sunshine?

Feedback from the community is most important.  Of course, we keep track of revenue and occupancy rates, but these numbers don’t provide any context that we can act on.  Obtaining real feedback from members through regular surveys provides a more accurate gauge of whether or not Sunshine is living up to customer expectations and provides direction that’s actionable.  Fortunately, entrepreneurs don’t tend to be shy about sharing their opinions so we know exactly where we stand.  It’s particularly important for the ongoing success of the business since 70% of new memberships are created through referrals.

How do you balance the qualitative elements relating to feedback with the quantitative numbers side?

The business model itself isn’t very complicated.  We know the model works and, being a “for profit” business, we need to keep track of the numbers.  But, revenue is not the overriding consideration and the numbers can be misleading.  Our success is more accurately measured by the happiness of our community.  We like to think of this as a place where we help each other to succeed.  For us, it’s better to look at something like, how many companies have we been able to graduate from Sunshine? We also work with entrepreneurs who want to be more active in the management of the programming.  We call these guys “Shiners” and it’s this level of engagement that tells us we’re doing something right.

You mentioned companies “graduating” from Sunshine Suites; is that a formal process?  Is there a ceremony or what?

It’s funny you mention that.  We’re working now to create a more formal process and you should see something in Entrepreneur Magazine about it in the near future.  Entrepreneurs who have “graduated”, our “alumni”, tend to stay active at Sunshine, providing mentoring to other entrepreneurs.  As well, we provide workshops, panel discussions, and bootcamps.

What do you see for Sunshine Suites in the future?

We are looking at expansion.  We would like to expand into other cities, but we want to be careful.  Every city is different.  They each have their own ecosystem and it’s important to know the environment and the people in order to provide something of value.

Distilling the meaning in relation to Indicee

So, how do we relate what Cheni told me to what we are trying to achieve at Indicee?  Simple.  The most important performance indicators for the business DO NOT come from the financial reports.

We all know the requirements for financial reporting.  A full set of financial statements are crucial for dealing with banks, tax authorities, and investors; but it’s like Cheni said, these numbers lack the context that’s needed to guide meaningful actions on the part of managers.

Using Indicee increases the contextual meaning of your numbers and guides action in that way, beyond the financial statements.

Your customer’s happiness is not an Income Statement line item.  The path to knowing your customer comes from looking at operational measures; things like behaviour, feedback, distribution, and consumption.  This requires building the additional dimensions into your reporting structure to capture these things.

Final thoughts and random words to live by

Working within a start-up environment and having worked for start-ups in the past, I fully appreciate and applaud what the Sunshine Suites community is doing.  I would also point to other great examples out there such as TechStars, YCombinator, and our own local BootupLabs and Network Hub doing great work incubating companies and providing mentoring in order to tilt the playing field a bit in favour of innovators and disruptors who will create the next generation of market leaders.  You could even look to mainstream media and programs like Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in Canada and the UK as a means of educating and illuminating what goes into building companies. You have to look past the TV-silliness, but it’s there.

I encourage anyone who is interested in this stuff to get involved.  Check out a networking event, look for people to follow on twitter, talk to your local politicians and get talking to each other.

During our conversation, Cheni told me about when he and Joe were last in Vancouver.  The two of them flew into YVR with 2 bicycles in boxes, they assembled the bikes in the airport, then rode from Vancouver all the way to Tijuana, Mexico.  He went on to tell me that he never buys a round trip ticket when he’s on vacation.  He buys a one-way ticket in order to stay open to the opportunities that present themselves. I think there’s a great lesson in that philosophy and it exemplifies what being an entrepreneur is all about.

Enjoy.

  • Share/Bookmark

Is Cloud Computing in your Company Culture?

by Mark Cunningham on February 9th, 2010

The terms “Cloud Computing” and “Software as a Service (SaaS)” are relatively new buzz phrases that have been flying around both the technology and business communities for the past few years. While these concepts might appear to be new and “radical” the reality is the implementation of these buzz phrases has been around for a number of years and there are a number of companies who have been using these technologies for years to provide both businesses and consumers with useful online products.

So why is the first question I get from IT and business executives, “How Secure is Indicee?” Each time I get this question I struggle with whether I should express my “inside head voice” or my “outside head voice.” Logic usually prevails and I take the high road. I know that most of the questions simply stem from a desire to the maintain the privacy and control of their corporate data. What is funny is that most of these executives don’t see the vulnerabilities they face in their current “inside the firewall” methodologies that are, in many cases, far more vulnerable than any of the current cloud technologies used today. Not to mention the huge security holes they have with employees being able email corporate data in spreadsheets and documents to just about anyone.

At the end of the day this debate really depends on which “lens” you choose to look at the world through. My belief is that the choice between using “cloud” or “inside the firewall” is first and foremost cultural. I see 3 cultural lenses most often and these lenses tend to follow Geoffrey Moore’s Technology Adoption Life Cycle curve

  1. Innovators Lens – these are the people or companies that are the first to hear about new technology and adopt it quicker than the vendors can produce it. When we talk to the IT and business leaders in innovative companies like this they are near polar opposite to laggards(see below). These are the companies that are trying to find as many ways to push everything they can into the cloud. Indicee’s operations are like this. We live in the cloud….Google Docs, Slide Rocket, Salesforce.com, Version 1, Amazon Web Services, Basecamp and a bunch more. If Stephanie, our sales goddess, tells me her computer spontaneously combusted I don’t have to ask her if she had it backed up. If Craig, our king of partnering, drops his laptop in the moat of Treasure Island while attending a conference I only need to ask how many beer he had. Everything we need is in the cloud, secure and waiting for us no matter what computer we are on. As you can see this lens has a very different view and the scenery is spectacular from my balcony. My advice to these companies….the wave is here RIDE IT!

  2. Wait and See Lens - “I don’t know about that cloud computing stuff….I know it seems to be hot and people are talking about it but I am just not sure.” This is a common statement I hear from both business and IT people in all sizes of organizations. The indecisiveness is a major challenge for these organizations especially when they dabble in the new technologies but they never fully commit to trying them in specific areas of the business. Instead they burn up endless cycles dabbling while maintaining the status quo of what they already have. These companies would be better served by making more clear and decisive decisions. SaaS services are amazing for doing small projects to determine their viability, they are low cost, easy to get going and if you don’t like them they are easy to kick to the curb. With SaaS and cloud computing you can actually be an innovator while you hold steady on your current course, something that has been historically more challenging to do with traditional enterpirse on-premise software. While the Wait and See crowd tends to take longer to change, they are much more open and receptive to the learning and change than a Laggard is. Wait and See types need validation from others, they need proof, they need trust and they need buy in from the rest of their peers. My advice to companies with this culture..pick something and DO IT! Live the Nike mantra and go for it.

  3. Laggards Lens -  I have met and visited with thousands of companies over the course of my career and what I have learned is that no matter how many facts, figures and benefits you put in front of a person(or company) if they are fundamentally apposed to it, culturally, you are probably not going to change their mind. Here is a simple, real world example of a conversation I have had with a Director of IT for $100M sporting goods manufacturing and distribution company: “The Founder of our business is an old school guy…he doesn’t even use email but he does use a phone. There is no way he is going to let us move our data outside the four walls of this building. As a matter of fact he only wants 4 people on the executive team to see any type of corporate data!” And that, my friends, is an exact quote. That is usually my cue to ask, “what is the quickest route back to the airport from here?” I actually like companies like this because I can see the lens they see the world through and I can quickly determine that our company and their company are probably not destined to do business together. Well, until the succession plan has been implemented and the founder has decided to move on. My only message to companies that adopt this type of culture…..have a listen to Bob Dylan’s “These Times They are A-Changin’”


So what does all of this have to do with the question,, “How Secure is Indicee?”  The answer is highly dependent on your cultural lens your company looks through. If you are an innovator, you already believe that the cloud is better, more secure and more reliable. It is built into your DNA. If you are laggard, well this “Cloud dog don’t hunt.”  If you are anywhere in between, then you just need to start hanging out with the innovators more often!

So what cultural lens does your company look through?

  • Share/Bookmark

Crowing about Business Intelligence

by Geoff Devereux on January 27th, 2010

Business Intelligence (B.I.), as an industry, is a bit of an odd bird.  Within the B.I. “family”, there are great conversations ongoing about using data to help organizations make better decisions, understanding data challenges within organizations, and observations on changes to general business practices and how they relate to the field.  For example, I’ve found some great insights from B.I. professionals within a bunch of different groups on the social networking site Linkedin.

There tends to be a “birds of a feather” thing happening with these guys though.  If you speak the language and have a passion for B.I., you become a member of the flock no problem.  Outside the flock though, the language seems obscure and the industry as a whole takes on a bit of a menacing pall like a murder of crows migrating into your neighbourhood.

from Artmenow's Art Blog

The analogy of crows actually serves a dual purpose here.  First, there’s the misunderstood nature of the crow.  Second, there’s a certain crow behaviour that I think helps to illustrate a key concept of B.I.

I recently watched a great documentary on CBC Television’s The Nature of Things that focused on crows.  Watching the show had me thinking, this has some parallels to the B.I. industry!

I think it’s fair to say that, to the uninitiated, the crow is a general nuisance; they have a way of sticking their beaks all up in your business.  Well, as it turns out, the crow is actually one of the most intelligent, playful, and mischievous creatures on the planet!  Crows have a proven ability to problem solve, reason, and they have long dependable memories.

They also engage in complex social interactions.  Very much a family oriented bird, they mate for life and extended family plays an active and ongoing role in the development of the next generation.  They even appear to have funeral rituals!  With over 250 distinct calls, crows have 2 separate dialects; one, for use within the flock and the other for the general public.  And lastly, crows love to play!  A key component for any intelligent species!  After watching the documentary, I found I have a great deal of respect for these guys.

The crow behaviour that I think is useful in illustrating a key concept in B.I. relates to their use of tools; more specifically, their use of meta-tools.  Let me explain.  If you watch the documentary, you’ll see that the crow researchers want to test our crow’s intelligence and problem-solving skills.  What’s required is for the crow to use one tool to get another tool that they can then use to get food.  That first tool is the meta-tool.  It’s the crow’s ability to follow through on this sequence that denotes intelligence.

1. See the food

2. See the tool that would help get the food, but is out of reach

3. Search out and find a meta-tool that will help reach the food-getting tool

4. Use the meta-tool to get the tool

5. Use the tool to get the food

In B.I., we have a concept called meta-data.  Similar thing.  It’s data about other data.  At Indicee, we use this meta-data to help us understand your company’s data.  The meta-data is the first step toward getting the food.

When we get the meta-data, it gives us the ability to go out and interpret your company data.  Once we’ve interpreted your company data, you’re able to nourish your business with the valuable insights that are now within reach.

What do you guys think?

  • Share/Bookmark

Ghost of Software Salesguys Past

by Geoff Devereux on January 20th, 2010

We are greatly influenced by our experiences.  As a child, the hand reaches out to a hot stove only once.

The last couple posts have talked about legacy issues; legacy IT systems, legacy education.  Today I’d like to talk about another actor in the Legacy IT Show, the classic software salesman (circa. 2004).

This guy (above) may or may not be selling software, but does the song and dance sound familiar? I’ve sat on both sides of the table. Listening to salesguys pitch software to me as a purchaser, and doing the accounting & finance work in a company selling enterprise software.  Software, as an industry, is still an infant relative to most other industries; and with youth, comes growing pains.  Here’s the story on both sides.

Listening to pitches, sitting through demos, taking notes only to be asked by a Director, “what would it cost if we just built our own?” was crushing.  Or, hearing about how easy a rollout will be (“it’s like lego”) and then, months later, hearing about how it won’t do all that stuff we thought it would do.  Did we send out that cheque yet?

On the sell-side, working with salesmen who could barely operate a computer or use excel well enough to complete an expense report.  There was one colleague who seemed to continually be calling me from the middle of a war zone, god bless ‘em.  The path to hell is paved with good intentions, indeed.

Over the years, I think we were selling more than software. We were selling a dream. And the dream was that somehow this product would magically work and fix all reporting and organizational problems. Presto!

Inevitably, due either to the vagaries of the software development cycle or to a salesguys overly optimistic nature, enterprise software was erroneously peddled as a solution to all life’s problems and the answer to all our prayers.  Coding is an art and the concept of Minimum Viable Product (MVP) didn’t work in a Web 1.0 kind of world.  It’s easy to forget this was all being pulled out of the air, out of imagination.  We can probably lay a bit of blame on the buyer’s side; I mean, we fell fer it!

Vapourware is the term used to describe selling software that’s still in development although, you could say the same for a solution not fit for the intended purpose.  Which gets us back to our salesguy, our classic software salesman.

A lack of technical expertise, in large part, meant they were simply oblivious to whether it would work or not.  The incentive structure certainly didn’t encourage it.  Once the papers were signed, they’re gone (in some respects that’s as it should be, most of these companies were hemorrhaging cash).  So, it’s a tough rap.  You can’t fault the guys.  There was a level of belief there; they wanted to believe the product would work.  They wanted to believe they could be the next Microsoft.  They wanted to believe their stock options would be worth something.  But they could only believe it because they didn’t know how the product worked.  You follow?

It’s just average guys trying to scratch out a living.  That Beamer doesn’t pay for itself!  If you’re willing to pay for it, we’re willing to do it!

We carry these experiences and memories with us.  Failed implementations.  The project that wouldn’t end.  Lack of adoption.  The work-arounds.  The broken promises, heartbreak, loathing.  It’s all still there lying dormant.  Fool me once and that.

Looking at Saas, the cloud, open APIs, etc, the question now is… can we let go of this baggage and start to trust that the dream is no longer so distant from reality in the software space?  Are we really in an era where systems can talk to each other?  Can share information?  Can snap together like lego?  Or, is it just Vapourware 2.0?

What do you think?  Yes? No? Let’s hear it.

Post Script. After finishing this post, I went to hear Julian Smith (co-author of Trust Agents) speak and he used the “hot burner” analogy. I’m going to go ahead and call that external validation.

  • Share/Bookmark
Older Posts »
RSS Twitter