<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RELEVANCE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indicee.com/blog/relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indicee.com/blog/relevance/</link>
	<description>Cloud Business Intelligence Platform and Reporting Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Devereux</title>
		<link>http://www.indicee.com/blog/relevance/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Devereux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indicee.com/?p=367#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.  I hear you on the &quot;DUH moment&quot;, but I think it bears repeating until, like you say, more than a few people start doing it. 
 
As with many things, easier said than done.  That&#039;s why, with this post, I&#039;m highlighting the measurement element on the reports themselves.  Maybe we&#039;ll get more people doing it if they can prove how meaningless some of their current reporting is from a readership basis. 
 
Any bets on how often the person most resistant to change will be the one least likely to be reading the reports? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.  I hear you on the &quot;DUH moment&quot;, but I think it bears repeating until, like you say, more than a few people start doing it. </p>
<p>As with many things, easier said than done.  That&#039;s why, with this post, I&#039;m highlighting the measurement element on the reports themselves.  Maybe we&#039;ll get more people doing it if they can prove how meaningless some of their current reporting is from a readership basis. </p>
<p>Any bets on how often the person most resistant to change will be the one least likely to be reading the reports?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Pineau</title>
		<link>http://www.indicee.com/blog/relevance/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Pineau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indicee.com/?p=367#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I think part of the SaaS promise is being able to gather such metrics across all seats - Nothing really new there except it seems few people do it (or at least make is available say in ISV/OEM cases). To me it&#039;s an essential feature not unlike GC mechanisms in programming :) If the stuff isn&#039;t being used, clean it up and whack it! Use the info to feedback into the business knowledge (of your customer domain). DUH moment to me but... 
 
Good piece, 
J. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the SaaS promise is being able to gather such metrics across all seats &#8211; Nothing really new there except it seems few people do it (or at least make is available say in ISV/OEM cases). To me it&#039;s an essential feature not unlike GC mechanisms in programming <img src='http://www.indicee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  If the stuff isn&#039;t being used, clean it up and whack it! Use the info to feedback into the business knowledge (of your customer domain). DUH moment to me but&#8230; </p>
<p>Good piece,<br />
J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

